I’m Red-beard The Pirate and I’ve helped thousands of students get killer grades with my book (and I’m even talking about the procrastinators too.)

For $4.99 you can have top-off-the-class grades or it’s free. Want to know more?

Image Source
The classroom can be a complicated place. I’m not sure I’m right about this and I’m definitely not comfortable assuming I’m wrong. Image Source

This is a dangerous article to write.

People are inundated with pro-teacher propaganda. Teaching is repeatedly called a “noble profession.” We’re reminded how teachers are shaping our future. To offer the slightest critique to the profession or even an individual teacher, gets met with harsh attacks.

That makes bringing up a subject like this one a little scary for me.

In this article, I’m not trying to attack teaching. I’m just trying to shine a light on some of the darker areas of the profession. I hope to help the profession grow by pointing out these unpleasant aspects of it.

I don’t disagree that teaching is a valuable and noble career but I also hesitate to accept that all professors spend their time teaching. Standing in front of a classroom doesn’t make you a teacher by my definition.

Image Source
Some of the best colleges in the world use credibility busting strategies to try and get students to try harder. Image Source

In a previous article, I wrote about a theory we have that teachers intentionally inflate the “required study time” they tell their students to encourage their students to study at all.

If they told their students, “you shouldn’t need to study more than an hour a week,” then those students would never study. If instead you told them, “you need to study at least an hour a day,” those same students would actually sit down to study once or twice a week (still less than an hour a day.) I don’t agree with this strategy but I had reason to believe it was regularly applied.

A few weeks later I actually got confirmation from a UCLA professor about this theory. With that confirmation came quite a few accusations against the site. Here is an excerpt:

You are correct to believe that I lie to my students to get them to study. You obviously understand why I do that. I’ve experienced the results myself.

Early in my teaching career I had a similar attitude as you. I was a green professor and figured I could relax about pushing my students to study. I wouldn’t encourage my students to study beyond the basics. I limited my encouragement to the students that obviously needed it. A student would come to me complaining about a D. I’d look them in the eyes and ask them how long they studied. It was obvious they didn’t.

After teaching as long as I have, you start to notice how you can change this.

Now I push my students to study at least 5 hours a week. Yes… I know it’s more than required to get a high score in my class but it changes everything in the average student’s behavior.

For one thing, I no longer receive half the complaints about low scores. Everyone knows that their grade is their responsibility. It’s not my business to get you to study. If you can’t study a fifth of the time I tell you to study then you’re the one to blame.

I get the impression students are more satisfied with the grades they get. Students that get a B in an easy class will complain. Students that get a B in a course they think is hard don’t complain.

This response surprised me in its admission. When I first discussed that theory, I had thought it was more of an unconscious behavior. I definitely admire the honesty of this professor. (That’s the fundamental reason I’m going to leave him unnamed.)

I do take issue with the professor’s reasoning, though:

His reason for lying to his students seems completely focused on his own convenience. His reason appears to be:

  • Lying to my students decreases the chances they’ll complain.

What he didn’t mention was:

  • Does it change their scores on average?
  • Does it teach the students more?
  • Do the students actually spend more time studying?

I’m sure this professor is a nice guy but there seems to be a complete lack of empathy in his explanation. How does this help or hurt the students?

At no point does he says those D students actually start studying more. He just suggests they’re less likely to whine to him about it.

He’s offering no proof of a better outcome for the student. (That doesn’t prove he’s wrong but it doesn’t give me hope that he’s onto something.)


Image Source
If students don’t study because they think they need it, they won’t study because you try and fool them half the time. Image Source

This is the part of the conversation that I got a bit of a kick out of:

You said it directly in your post. You know why we tell these kinds of lies but people like you completely ruin their effectiveness. It’s like you’re publishing that our medication is a placebo in an attempt to sell your own product.

When you publish this kind of stuff, you are hurting students ability to study. I understand you think you can push them into a reasonable study routine but it’s not that simple.

First of all, virtually all the information that this blog provides is free. Nothing is sold on this site (at this time) and virtually nothing is promoted beyond the ideas.

To me, this sounds an awful lot like:

Having to lie to someone to get them to do what you want is pretty pessimistic. Ever think of providing evidence and trying to win them over with logic?

In this case, I suspect it’s a massive case of lost credibility.

When you tell someone they need to study for 5 hours a week in hopes they’ll study for 1 hour a week, you’re not very credible. Students can tell when their teachers are lying. People are good at catching deception. Odds are, they aren’t fooled.

I don’t think it’s this teacher’s fault.

Most students don’t believe their teachers are very credible.

Teachers attempt to correct this by lying (and becoming even less credible.)

This looks like a silly way to solve the problem.

Image Source
The 15MSS isn’t magic but it’s a practical strategy for most students. More important in my mind, it’s honest. Image Source

15MSS Critique

I get that students don’t need to study as long as I encourage them but 15 minutes is not nearly enough. Peak memorization is around 10-20 minutes but minutes 20 to 30 are just as effective as the first 10. And ultimately, it’s not about efficiency. It’s about knowledge. 15 minutes just isn’t enough.

I understand this critique and disagree but it seems like a minor difference in my mind. I agree that the 15MSS time is open for adjustment based on the difficulty of a student’s course load.

Some math to help out:

15 minutes x 7 days a weeks = 1 hour and 45 minutes of studying a week.

Earlier in his email he suggested 1 hour of studying a week was enough:

If you can’t study a fifth of the time I tell you to study then you’re the one to blame.

Of course, the 15 minute study session should be split between multiple courses. In practice, I would expect our disagreement to be 15 minutes to 30 minutes difference per week.

This is because a good chunk of classes won’t require any studying. A good chunk of the classes that require studying are cyclical in nature. Some weeks studying is a necessity. Other weeks it’s not.

If this professor is suggesting that our 15 minute study strategy should be a 20-30 minute study strategy then I understand. This is where my full case for the 15 minute study strategy should be addressed. The short version:

  • It’s not how long you study but how focused you are.
  • Focus takes effort and energy. (It can wear you out.)
  • 15 minutes increases the chances you’ll have enough time to study.
  • Habitual focus improves your ability to focus.
  • It’s about top notch grades (not perfect ones.)
  • Once your focus is getting weaker during your session, you need recovery time.

In fitness, this might be thought of in this way:

Working out with a certain intensity lets you repeat it day after day without getting weaker.

Weight lifters can’t lift insanely high personal bests every day because their body needs time to recover. If they try to, their body will fail.

Why This UCLA Professor Lies To His Students
Why This UCLA Professor Lies To His Students

Instead, they have easier sessions that allow them to work out daily without needing recovery as often. They may go for a personal best but they plan for the recovery time after that.

The 15MSS is about studying while you’re in your peak and then stopping.

The next day you don’t need recovery. In fact, you feel better about studying because the day before you stopped while you were still kicking butt. You weren’t drained. That means you’re more likely to study.

This is a positive loop that can change the way you think about studying (and life.)

So… what do you think about teachers lying to their students to get them to study more? Am I missing the point? Is it horrible or an acceptable evil? Comment below!

Why This UCLA Professor Lies To His Students

Accelerated Learning Secrets First Written About In Shakespeare’s Times Reemerging And Being Conclusively Proven In Today’s Academic Journals

Professors Karpicke of Purdue University and Roediger, III of Washington University published an incredible paper that is making waves in the top rungs of Academia.

Colleges have taken pride in their ability to train the next generation of students for decades now. By subjecting their students to intimidating reading, long and immense lectures, and rigorous and unforgiving testing, they claim to have properly trained their graduates.

But modern research methods are calling those very claims into question.

You see… what these professors have discovered (and more are joining them every day) is shaking the very foundations of academia – all of the endless hours of studying, reading books, taking notes, and listening to endless lectures… doesn’t really teach students all that much – not even preparing them for the very tests they’re using.

The exact things that colleges and many professors have been encouraging are hindering students’ abilities to learn by occupying their time with ineffective methodologies.

Effective learning isn’t rocket science either….

“Francis Bacon wrote about these effective study strategies in the 1500’s – and the research is proving that we should have been listening to the preachers of this all along,” says Aaron Richardson, founder of Smart Student Secrets, a decade old, religiously followed, website dedicated to reintroducing these strategies to modern students.

“The reality is, the average university spends 4 years lecturing a student on what they could master in 6 months or less – if they used effective strategies.”

Confronting Mr. Richardson, I grilled him on the academic defenses of our country’s historic and prestigious Universities.

R: Doesn’t the work separate the wheat from the chaff? Give them work and those that best do it are better BECAUSE they worked harder to do it. The hard work itself is the target.

A: Assuming the wheat is the people that mindlessly follow directions and don’t have better things to do with their time… sure. But I’m advocating for the creative thinkers that are willing to challenge the status quo. They’re the wheat I’m giving my tools to.

R: But colleges say your strategies help you score higher on tests but not “understand” the material in a deeper way. Any response?

A: First thing, in academia, you’re judged on your ability to pass tests and answer questions – they have no other way. By their own standards, their strategies are worse.

Second, mull on any idea for a few years longer and you’ll have a deeper understanding of it. That’s the easy part. You do it every time you take a shower. The hard part is learning enough of the component parts to be able to mull it over. The sooner you do that, the sooner you can understand it deeper.

And one more thing…

I don’t really care if they criticize because the data speaks for itself. I advocate for the data their own studies are proving. They may be able to hide the truth for a while but it’s getting out and the longer they hold out, the worse it’s going to look for them – not me.

R: Mr. Richardson you have recently published a guide outlining his effective strategies in detail. It’s called, “How To Study Happier,” and has a 4 star review from students and some reviews making some pretty impressive claims. Right?

A: I’ve dedicated my life to helping students that are like the kid I used to be. And I guarantee that my book can help you get better grades – and if you’re not 100% satisfied with the changes then I’ll refund it completely. Show me one college that will do that for you!

R: So… Mr. Richardson, I’ve heard you’ve been taking some heat from academia over your claims.

A: For legal reasons, I have to keep my mouth shut on this one. All I can say is that I can’t guarantee my content will stay available much longer. Get it now or prices will be higher for legal reasons (if I can even keep the book available.)

Now is the time to click on the link I’ll add below, fill in the boxes, and get your copy today if you’re interested.

Get your copy of How To Study Happier


Tagged on:                 

4 thoughts on “Why This UCLA Professor Lies To His Students

  • December 5, 2016 at 5:46 pm

    That’s crazy.

    The nerve of that guy!

    • December 5, 2016 at 5:52 pm

      I don’t really mean it in that way.

      It came off a little snotty in my mind but I’m sure this guy has the best of intentions.

  • December 5, 2016 at 5:45 pm

    I agree with you.

    This guy sounds absolutely nuts. I can’t believe he’d have the nerve to write about his students like they’re animals to be trained. He rings his little bell to get them salivating.

    I can’t blame him on the 15 minute thing. I couldn’t believe it at first either. It was kind of nuts when I was trying it. I thought I was setting myself up to suck but month after month my grades were steady. It’s nuts.

    • December 5, 2016 at 5:49 pm

      I still feel like I’m getting away with something!

      haha It’s amazing!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *